Take, for instance, the case of the Inside HigherEd article published today that follows Cornell's attempt to dispel its image as a 'suicide school':

Of all the things Cornell University wants to be known for, suicide isn’t among them. And yet, after years of trying to shake the image that it’s a “suicide school,” as one official called it Monday, recent deaths have made it difficult not to associate the upstate New York institution with an above-average suicide rate.

Nowhere in the opening sentences is it stated (nor even suggested) that Cornell does not have an above average suicide rate. It may have above average suicide publicity, but statistic after statistic shows that Cornell does not have any more suicides than would be expected for a given population of college students.

So in lieu of fact, the reporters cite mythology, to further cement the connection in the reader's brain.

And then to add insult to injury, the actual facts of the matter are buried farther into the article, but further seeds of doubt are planted (my emphasis is added in bold):

“It’s well known that Cornell has a reputation as a ‘suicide school,’ which is not consistent with the reality of the statistics,” Marchell said. “And so we’ve asked ourselves, well, what leads to this, what contributes to that misperception?”

His answer: the gorges. “Suicide that occurs in most communities is not something that happens in public, is not visible,” he said, noting that news media often don’t report on suicides because they happen privately and there are often concerns about copycat suicides.

It's unclear whether the university considers the rash of suicides as working out to about average over the last few suicide-free years, or an indication that something is systemically wrong at Cornell.

Thankfully an alumnus sets the record straight in the comments section:

Other institutions without similar "attractive nuisances" usually escape public attention when suicides occur among their students. The reason? Those tragedies generally take place behind closed doors on private property, such as residence halls, Greek houses or off-campus apartments. Although information about such deaths will undoubtedly circulate, the audiences tends to be much smaller; in addition, the media does not have ready access to information or to the scene.

Since leaving Cornell, I have worked with two other institutions that each endured one or more significant "suicide clusters" like the one Cornell appears to be experiencing now. Two of those clusters involved more student deaths than the number of losses Cornell has suffered: In one case, nine died in 18 months; in the other, and there were seven deaths in 10 months. In both situations the clusters took place on small campuses with less than one-tenth the enrollment of Cornell--thus making their suicide-per-capita ratios far higher than Cornell's. Yet not a single one of these 16 suicides on the other campuses was noted in any local media, aside from some losses being included in local obituaries.

So why did those other institutions not get the "suicide school" notoriety that Cornell has? Simple: All of their deaths occurred behind closed doors on campus property. While friends and classmates were certainly impacted by the losses and undoubtedly some fellow students availed themselves of campus resources and support services, news of the deaths just didn't travel very far. (The lack of "buzz" also had one particularly unfortunate consequence: It took the administrators of those other institutions longer to discern the troubling "cluster" patterns and to take action.)

Unfortunately, however, the article ran in USA Today, without the above-mentioned comment.

So here's what we know:

Statistics can tell you a lot more than anecdotes. And the fact is that suicide is a "stunningly common" way for people of this age to die. It's the second leading cause of death for young adults and that over long periods of time, Cornell has not had a suicide rate outside of the national average. Just because you hear about these tragic incidents more often because of their shockingly public nature doesn't mean that Cornell is afflicted by any more suicides than any other top school. In fact, for the last couple of years there were no student suicides.

The recent string of deaths has been an absolute tragedy, and unfortunately sometimes lightening strikes more than once, especially given the contagion nature of this sort of behavior. And Cornell will no doubt redouble it efforts to increase mental health awareness on campus, something it is already nationally recognized for. There are certainly things that Cornell can do to further limit this type of horrible situation.

But erroneously suggesting that Cornell is a "suicide school" or placing blame on Cornell as an institution for the unexplainable is not going to help matters at all.

Take, for instance, the case of the Inside HigherEd article published today that follows Cornell's attempt to dispel its image as a 'suicide school':

Of all the things Cornell University wants to be known for, suicide isn’t among them. And yet, after years of trying to shake the image that it’s a “suicide school,” as one official called it Monday, recent deaths have made it difficult not to associate the upstate New York institution with an above-average suicide rate.

Nowhere in the opening sentences is it stated (nor even suggested) that Cornell does not have an above average suicide rate. It may have above average suicide publicity, but statistic after statistic shows that Cornell does not have any more suicides than would be expected for a given population of college students.

So in lieu of fact, the reporters cite mythology, to further cement the connection in the reader's brain.

And then to add insult to injury, the actual facts of the matter are buried farther into the article, but further seeds of doubt are planted (my emphasis is added in bold):

“It’s well known that Cornell has a reputation as a ‘suicide school,’ which is not consistent with the reality of the statistics,” Marchell said. “And so we’ve asked ourselves, well, what leads to this, what contributes to that misperception?”

His answer: the gorges. “Suicide that occurs in most communities is not something that happens in public, is not visible,” he said, noting that news media often don’t report on suicides because they happen privately and there are often concerns about copycat suicides.

It's unclear whether the university considers the rash of suicides as working out to about average over the last few suicide-free years, or an indication that something is systemically wrong at Cornell.

Thankfully an alumnus sets the record straight in the comments section:

Other institutions without similar "attractive nuisances" usually escape public attention when suicides occur among their students. The reason? Those tragedies generally take place behind closed doors on private property, such as residence halls, Greek houses or off-campus apartments. Although information about such deaths will undoubtedly circulate, the audiences tends to be much smaller; in addition, the media does not have ready access to information or to the scene.

Since leaving Cornell, I have worked with two other institutions that each endured one or more significant "suicide clusters" like the one Cornell appears to be experiencing now. Two of those clusters involved more student deaths than the number of losses Cornell has suffered: In one case, nine died in 18 months; in the other, and there were seven deaths in 10 months. In both situations the clusters took place on small campuses with less than one-tenth the enrollment of Cornell--thus making their suicide-per-capita ratios far higher than Cornell's. Yet not a single one of these 16 suicides on the other campuses was noted in any local media, aside from some losses being included in local obituaries.

So why did those other institutions not get the "suicide school" notoriety that Cornell has? Simple: All of their deaths occurred behind closed doors on campus property. While friends and classmates were certainly impacted by the losses and undoubtedly some fellow students availed themselves of campus resources and support services, news of the deaths just didn't travel very far. (The lack of "buzz" also had one particularly unfortunate consequence: It took the administrators of those other institutions longer to discern the troubling "cluster" patterns and to take action.)

Unfortunately, however, the article ran in USA Today, without the above-mentioned comment.

So here's what we know:

Statistics can tell you a lot more than anecdotes. And the fact is that suicide is a "stunningly common" way for people of this age to die. It's the second leading cause of death for young adults and that over long periods of time, Cornell has not had a suicide rate outside of the national average. Just because you hear about these tragic incidents more often because of their shockingly public nature doesn't mean that Cornell is afflicted by any more suicides than any other top school. In fact, for the last couple of years there were no student suicides.

The recent string of deaths has been an absolute tragedy, and unfortunately sometimes lightening strikes more than once, especially given the contagion nature of this sort of behavior. And Cornell will no doubt redouble it efforts to increase mental health awareness on campus, something it is already nationally recognized for. There are certainly things that Cornell can do to further limit this type of horrible situation.

But erroneously suggesting that Cornell is a "suicide school" or placing blame on Cornell as an institution for the unexplainable is not going to help matters at all.

From very early on, the specter of suicide haunted Ithaca's gorges. In 1889, an engineering student named Edward Wyckoff drew up plans for a suspension bridge to span the northern gorge, Fall Creek. When a professor failed his proposal, Wyckoff angrily withdrew from the university, and, as legend had it, threw himself into the ravine. In fact, Wyckoff never jumped, and a decade later financed the bridge's construction himself. His erstwhile instructor was vindicated, however, when a replacement was installed in 1961. Still, the rather tenuous bridge remains steeped in mythology: it's said a kiss shared at midnight will portend certain marriage, while one unreturned will collapse the bridge entirely...

In 1764, Immanuel Kant speculated that anyone who beholds "deep gorges with raging streams in them wastelands lying deep in shadow and inviting melancholy meditation, and so on is indeed seized by amazement bordering on terror, by horror and sacred thrill." Under such circumstances, thought Kant, a man would be "diminished to insignificance," seeing only the "misery, peril, and distress that would compass the man who was thrown to its mercy." As his subjects contemplated the downstream abyss, Siegel noted, the thought of suicide was eerily comforting.

At bottom, the question for Cornell is not whether the gorges afford a dangerous outlet for the disconsolate or disturbed (by all accounts, they do). It's if, absent the gorges, some of the suicides could be avoided. Common sense suggests, as one official told the Times in 1994, "if you put a barrier up on a bridge, that people won't die from that bridge. Even if barriers were installed, people could just go somewhere else." That's the same thing people said about the Golden Gate Bridge, until a landmark 1978 study proved otherwise..

Meanwhile, over at The Sun, comments are piling up over what can be done to prevent further student suicides. Opinions tend to fall within two camps: 1) that the University needs to be a better job of "protecting the gorges" through 24/7 security, higher railings, and camera surveillance, or, 2) that the gorges are not the problem, but that the University could try to do more to make certain that all students feel like they are a part of the greater Cornell community and have adequate on-campus support to deal with academic, social, family, or health pressures.

Longtime readers will no doubt surmise that I fall in the second camp. To me, the aesthetic appeal of the gorges and campus should not be sacrificed for perceived safety. (Although maybe covered bridges with windows would look pretty?) But I think it's clear that the diverse and dynamic nature of the student experience at Cornell makes it more of a challenge for some students to find their place on East Hill, and more supportive structures can be put in place to make the tricky road of late-stage adolescence more navigable for all. Cornell is not doing anything wrong, but it can be doing more right.

President David Skorton sent an e-mail to the Cornell community Friday night that struck a much more personal and urgent tone than his previous announcements.

"Your well being is the foundation on which your success is built. You are not alone," he said in the e-mail. "Your friends, your family, your teachers, your colleagues, and an array of counselors and advisors are ready to listen and help you through whatever you are facing. If you learn anything at Cornell, please learn to ask for help. It is a sign of wisdom and strength."

Meanwhile, Elie asks if the Engineering School is going to reconsider its curriculum. But that's a bit premature, as we have no clue as to the circumstances surrounding the tragedies of the last two days.

Deputy Provost David Harris has been appointed to a new position in the Obama Administration and will vacate his Cornell post on Mar. 19, he confirmed to The Sun Friday.

Harris will serve as the deputy assistant secretary for human services policy in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation in the Department of Health and Human Services.

The Office of Human Services policy “focuses on welfare, poverty, service delivery issues, data for research, policies affecting children, youth, and families, and economic matters affecting the [HHS], according to its website.

Harris will specifically be working on improving the effectiveness of the federal government's anti-poverty programs, no doubt due to his interest in the persistence of poverty among minority groups. It's an interesting time to be in the field, as the Obama administration has recently started publishing new definitions of poverty.

This is certainly an excellent opportunity for Harris, but no doubt a significant blow to the University. By all accounts, Harris was held in high esteem both in Ithaca and across academia. And he has spearheaded the University's goal to strengthen and unify its fragmented social science units. So his leadership would have been welcome as the 'Reimagining' project moves towards its implementation phase.

We'll hopefully be featuring a conversation with Harris before he begins in D.C., but until then, readers can read our two-part interview with him from two years ago.

But Cornellians this year don’t need to read past the first paragraph. As one student at the scene this afternoon succinctly put it, “didn’t this just happen?” Sinclair brings the fatality count up to 11 – 11 emails about knowing, helping, and remembering. With all male victims, this year has been wrought with sadness. “I do want to acknowledge the toll we all may be experiencing from repeated losses already this year,” Skorton added in his email address to the Cornell community.

Physics professor Robert E. Thorne reflected upon the loss to his students this evening by sending an email delaying the week’s assignment and allowing students time to come to terms with the loss. “I knew William as a curious, warm and gentle person of great promise. This is a terrible loss.” Thorne went on to tell the Review via email that “unfortunately, [that] does little justice to the person he was.” Sinclair, who lived in Maryland, took several courses in engineering outside of his major that interested him – namely computer science and physics.

Expect to hear the announcement by tomorrow afternoon. But we'll provide a hint to our longtime readers: This administrator has been featured prominently on this blog before.

While Andy Bernard is a humorous character, unfortunately there isn't anything very endearing to his personality. His fictional associations with Cornell paint the University in a light of both arrogance and ignorance. Nothing about his values channel the University's traditions of 'elite without being elitest', 'freedom and responsibility', 'any person... any study", or a 'private institution with a public mission'.

And nothing about him suggests the Law School's tagline of 'Lawyers in the Best Sense'. (Unless of course, the Law School is now interested in producing ambulance chasers, which would be a pretty good occupation for Andy.)

As Homer Simpson once wisely said, "It's funny because it's true." And the dirty little secret is that there is more than a glint of truth to the character of Andy Bernard -- the writers for The Office didn't pull the material out of thin air.

A healthy minority of Cornellians like to blindly brag about their association with a certain athletic conference, their difficult coursework in one of the applied social science departments of the Ag School, or their parties, that quite frankly, are meek relative to what you might find in the Big Ten on any given Saturday. So I can think of a handful of my peers who fit the 'Nard Dog role pretty damn well.

And I don't know about you, but that's not something I really want to advertise. It would be akin to Princeton advertising their ridiculously status-conscious bicker process, or Dartmouth prominently featuring its beer-soaked party scene, on Harvard reveling in the fact that is a soulless corporate bureaucracy focused solely on money (with a crappy hockey team, to boot).

So by all means, let's have a sense of humor about ourselves. And let's poke fun of our own bourgeois attitudes. But let's keep it to the pages of the Cornell Lunatic and not in public as a recruitment tool. Especially for a professional school that leans heavily upon its own reputation -- as opposed to research or scientific contributions -- for its success.

We can save the weather for our front page jokes.

More here.

Late Update: For those of you who don't quite understand the problem with this (beyond the fact that the 'Nard Dog has no ties to the Law School), Andy Bernard is like the uncle in your family that nobody quite likes. You can laugh at him in the presence of good friends, and smirk at him in the presence of polite company. But you don't bring him up unless asked.

One of the more provocative ideas surrounding admissions options was floated by Kent Fuchs at the Cornell Alumni Leadership Conference in January, where he suggested that freshman should be only accepted to the University at large, and not affiliate with an undergraduate college until their sophomore year.

This would centralize the admissions process, make the Cornell educational experience more flexible, and not force students to prematurely choose their academic path. There are a lot of students applying to Cornell who cannot clearly communicate why they would like to study nutrition over biology or ILR over AEM. But it would also arguably dilute the quality of the experience in some of the more cohesive colleges on campus, namely Architecture, Hotel, and Engineering.

Another option would be to make the Cornell application process itself more dynamic and engaging, even if this means making it harder to apply to Cornell. (In my view, that would be a feature, not a bug.) Right now, the University is asking one lame supplemental question per college as past of the Common Application.

Nowhere in the application process is the University trying to excite students about the intellectual riches that await them in Ithaca, nor is it trying to uniquely brand itself or its student body. By contrast, Northwestern asks its students about the research they have conducted and Tufts asks students to ponder 'Are we alone?', while also giving them the opportunity to submit their own YouTube video.

So how about a distinctly Cornellian essay prompt about 'Freedom and Responsibility' or public outreach and engagement?

One of my big complaints about the admissions office under Davis was that it was too numbers focused -- not in terms of SAT scores and GPA (that's another story) -- but in terms of applications received, acceptance rate, and other rather trivial metrics. See, for example, the article in the Chronicle about Davis's depature:

Since 2000, the university has streamlined the application process, increased student diversity, become more selective in admitting students and accepted more international students than ever; it has implemented an online application review process, enhanced its work with community-based organizations to specifically target low-income students and improved financial aid.

At the same time, Cornell continues to attract more students. More than 36,000 students applied for 3,150 places in the Class of 2014, a new high.

"I am proud of the enormous success we've had in increasing admissions applications to Cornell -- applications have increased over 65 percent since my arrival," said Davis."

Now's the opportunity to make the Cornell admissions process a distinctly Cornellian one. Even if it means our acceptance rate would go up, we need to ensure that we are attracting the right types of students for Cornell.

No matter what happens in the NCAA tournament, I can't emphasize enough what a pleasure it has been to follow this team over the last four years. Their stories -- from an out of nowhere Jon Jaques to a local boy done good in Jeff Foote -- are enough to make any Cornellian proud. Their talent and character, both on and off the court, will far ring the story of the glory of Cornell.

Two memories of mine stand out in particular:

The first was at a basketball game in Allston four years ago, when I convinced a couple of friends that our basketball team was worth seeing. We ended up seeing a nerve-wracking, buzzer-haunting, one point loss, but not before we could tell that Cornell has something special in Louis Dale and Ryan Wittman. (And, not coincidentally, before I got into a heckling match with a bunch of eight-year old Crimson fans. The only fans fair Harvard seemed to be able to attract that night.)

The second was attending the home game against Columbia this past January, when I somehow found myself standing next to Jeff Foote after the game. Sweat was still dripping off of his forehead and I was a bit intimidated by the fact that he seemed twice as massive as I was, but Jeff just has an awesome grin on his face.

Congratulations to the Big Red Basketball team for all of your accomplishments, past, present, and future.

Sun: Some of the task force reports mentioned a decrease in the number of higher level courses because of fewer faculty members. Is this going to be a trend?

K.F.: We’re hoping not to shrink the faculty any more than we already have. My higher priority is to keep the faculty size at its current level, and even to regrow it. You’re right, if we have to balance the budget by reducing faculty, then that does mean fewer courses, particularly electives. Our hope is that we can avoid that. We don’t yet know if we can do that, but we hope to not have to shrink the faculty any more. That’s why we’re trying to attain $90 million of administrative savings.

Sun: Many of the task force reports discuss possible mergers among colleges. Have there been further developments on the feasibility of these plans?

K.F.: For some, yes, and for some, no. For example, the College of Engineering was proposing a possibility of a combined science. It’s unlikely we’re going to do that. We are, however, discussing whether AEM should become a school and whether there should be a school of environment, both [of which were] proposed by CALS.

Sun: It seems odd that AEM is in CALS.

K.F.: The AEM major is a highly ranked major for undergraduate business, but we also have management programs in the Hotel School, the Johnson School and some business in ILR; Engineering has a masters in management, so we’re trying to decide how we can be best organized around management.

Sun: Are you planning to create a school of public policy, and if so, will it be built out of one of our current schools?

K.F.: That’s going to be a big decision and we don’t know yet.

Sun: Is the College of Arts and Sciences — especially the government or economics departments — playing a role in the school of public policy?

K.F.: It will. We’re not yet ready to bring in all of the colleges because I’ve asked a couple of deans to think about it. The Arts College, because of its breadth, has some type of impact, whether it’s social sciences or economics.

Sun: How will such major changes in the University structure impact the budget model?

K.F.: That’s why I’m such a big supporter of changing the budget model. If we pool undergraduate tuition, we can make it easier to pull down barriers between colleges, at least from a student’s perspective. For colleges, we have to ensure that we don’t create negative incentives that will make them compete with each other.

In another interesting tidbit, apparently the Policy Analysis and Management program in Human Ecology has decided to rename itself 'Public Policy', perhaps trying to distance itself from the pre-business crowd.

“After 3 1/2 interesting and enjoyable years at Cornell and in Ithaca, my family and I have decided to return home to the United Kingdom,” Walsh said in the release. “Cornell is a wonderful place. I have had the honor to work with a great group of talented and dedicated people, and I’ve learned a lot during my time here that I will apply to new endeavors in the U.K. I also feel proud to be leaving a stronger and more professional Investment Office than the one I found when I arrived.”

In the statement, Walsh also reported that the University’s endowment performance is up about 10 percent so far this year, after suffering a more than 25 percent decrease in fiscal year 2009. In the midst of the bleak financial situation that engulfed the nation in 2009, the statement noted that the University’s “endowment successfully avoided many of the liquidity problems that affected those of its peers last year.”

“Working with the Investment Committee, James helped the University weather the downturn and begin to regain much needed equilibrium in its investment performance,” President Skorton said in the statement. “I wish him all the best in his future endeavors.”

Skorton might as well have added, "And don't let the door kick you on the way out."

While the press release is padded in good will, the performance is obvious: while Cornell lost 26.4 percent of its investments in the last fiscal year, other peer schools, like Columbia and Pennsylvania, lost less than 20 percent.

Remember, when Walsh was first hired, he was aglow in the opportunities of hedge funds and commodities. That didn't turn out so well for us. Walsh also was offered a first year salary of $400,000, not counting any incentive bonuses. We wonder if there were any clawback provisions to his contract for subsequent poor performance.

Curiously, when MetaEzra first learned of a departure that turned out to be that of Doris Davis, our thoughts initially turned to Walsh.

But now we can report that we also know of one other high-level departure coming down the pike as well...

So the Sun is running an op-ed piece today that implicitly argues that Cornell should be playing a large role in the discussion when it comes to regulating the process.:

Oversight for natural gas drilling in New York is in the hands of Governor David Paterson and the DEC’s proposed regulations — local governments hold no power over the gas companies that drill in their area. Thus, should hydraulic fracturing be allowed under the proposed regulatory measures, gas companies would legally be able to dump millions of gallons of wastewater into local plants, which may lack the capacity to treat all the solvents in the fluid and would not have to publicly disclose what chemicals they have used.

In addition to considering the immense trucking needed to haul the water to and from the well site and protecting New York’s gorgeous natural landscape, consider that under such loose regulations residents would be dependent on the good character of gas companies, geared to seek profit rather than societal well-being.

It's a critical issue that Cornell needs to weigh-in on, because only a land-grant institution like Cornell can gain the confidence of all interested parties, including government, industry, and the public at large. Currently, Cornell Cooperative Extension has an extensive website dealing with all of the issues involved.

What I haven't seen, however, is an estimate of how much the Marcellus Shale reserves could be worth to Cornell. Obviously the value of the gas deposits is subject to market swings, but given the University's structural deficit, it's definitely necessary to place the value of Marcellus within the context of the University's budget challenges.

In Tompkins County alone, Cornell owns 11,000 acres of land. (I actually haven't been able to track down the total number of acres that Cornell owns in New York State, but the University owns 400,000+ acres across the country. If you have a more detailed breakdown of the University's land holdings, please let me know.)

Now, according to estimates by the University's department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, each acre of Marcellus Shale is worth approximately $30,000 over the course of the next 10-15 years. That's assuming roughly 6,000,000 cubic feet of gas per acre and a payment of $5 per thousand cubic feet. And prices have jumped around between $3 and $8 in the past couple of years.

So in Tompkins County alone, Cornell could yield $330 MM over the next ten to fifteen years from Marcellus Shale drilling. That's $30 MM a year for the next ten years, or around a quarter of the University's structural $135MM deficit, or just about the cost of the University's increased financial aid packages in recent years.

The question, of course, is whether or not that is worth the cost of potential drinking water contamination and all of the associated health risks. Interestingly, the same Cornell report indicates that wind power actually would produce 25% more energy per acre than drilling. The difference of course, is that wind power is clean and endless.

I know I am sounding like a crotchety old alum, but part of the Lynah experience is being in the barn before the hockey game starts. If we're not going to win on the ice, at least we can win in the stands.

That said, I was pleased that most of you seemed to know the lyrics to My Old Cornell. The Yale fans that I was sitting with were impressed.

Late Update: Discussion has continued on eLynah and on Elie's blog.